Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 24.0 TH/s |
| 5,625 W | Power Consumption | 1,980 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 82.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,756 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Innosilicon T2 Turbo
Based on BTC price of $70,395 and current network difficulty as of Mar 19, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The Innosilicon T2 Turbo holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon T2 TurboScore: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.06/day compared to $-4.02/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo?
The Innosilicon T2 Turbo scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo runs at 82.5 J/TH — a difference of 67.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
