Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Hashrate 375.0 TH/s Power 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Hashrate 24.0 TH/s Power 1,980 W Efficiency 82.5 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo
375.0 TH/s Hashrate 24.0 TH/s
5,625 W Power Consumption 1,980 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 82.5 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level
Weight 7,500.0 kg
19,193 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,756 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00016253 BTC $11.44
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$2.06
Monthly -$61.76
Yearly -$751.35

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Daily Revenue 0.00001040 BTC $0.73
Daily Electricity -$4.75
Daily Profit -$4.02
Monthly -$120.59
Yearly -$1,467.21

Based on BTC price of $70,395 and current network difficulty as of Mar 19, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The Innosilicon T2 Turbo holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.06/day compared to $-4.02/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo?

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo runs at 82.5 J/TH — a difference of 67.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.