Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1366

Avalon A1366

Hashrate 130.0 TH/s Power 3,250 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner 841

Canaan AvalonMiner 841

Hashrate 13.6 TH/s Power 1,290 W Efficiency 94.9 J/TH

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1366 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner 841
130.0 TH/s Hashrate 13.6 TH/s
3,250 W Power Consumption 1,290 W
25.0 J/TH Efficiency 94.9 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
12.6 kg Weight 4,700.0 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,402 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1366

Daily Revenue 0.00005982 BTC $4.73
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$3.07
Monthly -$92.19
Yearly -$1,121.67

Canaan AvalonMiner 841

Daily Revenue 0.00000626 BTC $0.49
Daily Electricity -$3.10
Daily Profit -$2.60
Monthly -$78.04
Yearly -$949.54

Based on BTC price of $79,014 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Avalon A1366 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 856% more hashrate (130.0 vs 13.6 TH/s) in the Avalon A1366's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Avalon A1366 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1366 and Canaan AvalonMiner 841 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1366 856% more hashrate (130.0 vs 13.6 TH/s)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 841 60% better power draw (3,250 vs 1,290 W)
  • Avalon A1366 74% better efficiency (25.0 vs 94.9 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1366 100% better weight (12.6 vs 4,700.0 kg)
  • Avalon A1366 152% more heat output (11,089 vs 4,402 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1366 16% more home mining score (36.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1366 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner 841
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$3.07 Daily net profit -$2.60
-$4,622 Net after 1 year -$950
-$5,743 Net after 2 years -$1,899
-$6,865 Net after 3 years -$2,849
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1366

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1366

25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 is more profitable at $-2.60/day compared to $-3.07/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Avalon A1366 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841: which fits a residential setup better?

The Avalon A1366 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 841). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1366 and Canaan AvalonMiner 841?

The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 runs at 94.9 J/TH — a difference of 69.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (25.0 vs 94.9 J/TH).