Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon A16XP

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Hashrate 300.0 TH/s Power 3,850 W Efficiency 12.8 J/TH

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1566 Specification Canaan Avalon A16XP
185.0 TH/s Hashrate 300.0 TH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 3,850 W
18.5 J/TH Efficiency 12.8 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.9 kg Weight 14.9 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,136 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008779 BTC $6.95
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.26
Monthly -$37.85
Yearly -$460.45

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Daily Revenue 0.00014236 BTC $11.26
Daily Electricity -$9.24
Daily Profit $2.02
Monthly $60.74
Yearly $738.97

Based on BTC price of $79,125 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16XP comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 62% more hashrate (185 vs 300 TH/s). The Avalon A1566 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Canaan Avalon A16XP — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon A16XP diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 62% more hashrate (185 vs 300 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1566 11% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,850 W)
  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 31% better efficiency (18.5 vs 12.8 J/TH)
  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 13% more heat output (11,669 vs 13,136 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1566 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1566 Metric Canaan Avalon A16XP
$5,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,280
-$1.26 Daily net profit $2.02
-$5,960 Net after 1 year -$3,541
-$6,421 Net after 2 years -$2,802
-$6,881 Net after 3 years -$2,063
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Takes ~5.8 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Canaan Avalon A16XP

$3.29/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1566

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon A16XP

12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $2.02/day compared to $-1.26/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan Avalon A16XP?

The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A16XP). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH — a difference of 5.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficiency (18.5 vs 12.8 J/TH).