Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1346

Avalon A1346

Hashrate 110.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon A16XP

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Hashrate 300.0 TH/s Power 3,850 W Efficiency 12.8 J/TH

Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1346 Specification Canaan Avalon A16XP
110.0 TH/s Hashrate 300.0 TH/s
3,300 W Power Consumption 3,850 W
30.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.8 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
12.3 kg Weight 14.9 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,136 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1346

Daily Revenue 0.00005220 BTC $4.14
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$3.78
Monthly -$113.53
Yearly -$1,381.22

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Daily Revenue 0.00014236 BTC $11.28
Daily Electricity -$9.24
Daily Profit $2.04
Monthly $61.19
Yearly $744.43

Based on BTC price of $79,230 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16XP comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 173% more hashrate (110 vs 300 TH/s). The Avalon A1346 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Canaan Avalon A16XP — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1346 and Canaan Avalon A16XP diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 173% more hashrate (110 vs 300 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1346 14% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,850 W)
  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 57% better efficiency (30.0 vs 12.8 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1346 17% better weight (12.3 vs 14.9 kg)
  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 17% more heat output (11,260 vs 13,136 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1346 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1346 Metric Canaan Avalon A16XP
$2,800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,280
-$3.78 Daily net profit $2.04
-$4,181 Net after 1 year -$3,536
-$5,562 Net after 2 years -$2,791
-$6,944 Net after 3 years -$2,047
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Takes ~5.7 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Canaan Avalon A16XP

$5.82/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1346

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon A16XP

12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan Avalon A16XP?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $2.04/day compared to $-3.78/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1346 or Canaan Avalon A16XP?

The Avalon A1346 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A16XP). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Avalon A1346 and Canaan Avalon A16XP on J/TH?

The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH — a difference of 17.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficiency (30.0 vs 12.8 J/TH).