Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1246

Avalon A1246

Hashrate 90.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 38.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon A16XP

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Hashrate 300.0 TH/s Power 3,850 W Efficiency 12.8 J/TH

Avalon A1246 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1246 Specification Canaan Avalon A16XP
90.0 TH/s Hashrate 300.0 TH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 3,850 W
38.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.8 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
12.3 kg Weight 14.9 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,136 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1246

Daily Revenue 0.00004142 BTC $3.28
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$4.93
Monthly -$147.97
Yearly -$1,800.35

Canaan Avalon A16XP

Daily Revenue 0.00013805 BTC $10.92
Daily Electricity -$9.24
Daily Profit $1.68
Monthly $50.35
Yearly $612.65

Based on BTC price of $79,088 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16XP comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 233% more hashrate (90.0 vs 300.0 TH/s). The Avalon A1246 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Canaan Avalon A16XP — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1246 and Canaan Avalon A16XP sit on each measurable spec:

  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 233% more hashrate (90.0 vs 300.0 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1246 11% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,850 W)
  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 66% better efficiency (38.0 vs 12.8 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1246 17% better weight (12.3 vs 14.9 kg)
  • Canaan Avalon A16XP 13% more heat output (11,669 vs 13,136 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1246 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1246 Metric Canaan Avalon A16XP
$1,800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,280
-$4.93 Daily net profit $1.68
-$3,600 Net after 1 year -$3,667
-$5,401 Net after 2 years -$3,055
-$7,201 Net after 3 years -$2,442
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Takes ~7.0 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Canaan Avalon A16XP

$6.61/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1246

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon A16XP

12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1246 vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $1.68/day compared to $-4.93/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1246 or Canaan Avalon A16XP?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1246 or the Canaan Avalon A16XP?

The Avalon A1246 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A16XP). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1246 and Canaan Avalon A16XP?

The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH — a difference of 25.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 66% better efficiency (38.0 vs 12.8 J/TH).