Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047

Canaan AvalonMiner 1047

Hashrate 37.0 TH/s Power 2,380 W Efficiency 64.3 J/TH

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1566 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
185.0 TH/s Hashrate 37.0 TH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 2,380 W
18.5 J/TH Efficiency 64.3 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
14.9 kg Weight 7,600.0 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,121 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008779 BTC $6.94
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.27
Monthly -$38.07
Yearly -$463.24

Canaan AvalonMiner 1047

Daily Revenue 0.00001756 BTC $1.39
Daily Electricity -$5.71
Daily Profit -$4.32
Monthly -$129.73
Yearly -$1,578.34

Based on BTC price of $79,038 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Avalon A1566 wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 400% more hashrate (185.0 vs 37.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1566's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1566 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1566 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1566 400% more hashrate (185.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 30% better power draw (3,420 vs 2,380 W)
  • Avalon A1566 71% better efficiency (18.5 vs 64.3 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1566 100% better weight (14.9 vs 7,600.0 kg)
  • Avalon A1566 44% more heat output (11,669 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1566 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1566 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
$5,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$1.27 Daily net profit -$4.32
-$5,963 Net after 1 year -$1,578
-$6,426 Net after 2 years -$3,157
-$6,890 Net after 3 years -$4,735
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1566

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1566

18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1566 is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-4.32/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Avalon A1566 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which fits a residential setup better?

The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Avalon A1566 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 45.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficiency (18.5 vs 64.3 J/TH).