Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1446

Avalon A1446

Hashrate 135.0 TH/s Power 3,310 W Efficiency 24.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047

Canaan AvalonMiner 1047

Hashrate 37.0 TH/s Power 2,380 W Efficiency 64.3 J/TH

Avalon A1446 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1446 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
135.0 TH/s Hashrate 37.0 TH/s
3,310 W Power Consumption 2,380 W
24.5 J/TH Efficiency 64.3 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
12.8 kg Weight 7,600.0 kg
11,294 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,121 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1446

Daily Revenue 0.00006406 BTC $5.07
Daily Electricity -$7.94
Daily Profit -$2.87
Monthly -$86.11
Yearly -$1,047.72

Canaan AvalonMiner 1047

Daily Revenue 0.00001756 BTC $1.39
Daily Electricity -$5.71
Daily Profit -$4.32
Monthly -$129.64
Yearly -$1,577.34

Based on BTC price of $79,195 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Avalon A1446 wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 265% more hashrate (135.0 vs 37.0 TH/s). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Avalon A1446 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1446 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Avalon A1446 265% more hashrate (135.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 28% better power draw (3,310 vs 2,380 W)
  • Avalon A1446 62% better efficiency (24.5 vs 64.3 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1446 100% better weight (12.8 vs 7,600.0 kg)
  • Avalon A1446 39% more heat output (11,294 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1446 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1446 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
$3,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.87 Daily net profit -$4.32
-$4,248 Net after 1 year -$1,577
-$5,295 Net after 2 years -$3,155
-$6,343 Net after 3 years -$4,732
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1446

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1446

24.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1446 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1446 is more profitable at $-2.87/day compared to $-4.32/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1446 or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?

The Avalon A1446 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1446 or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?

The Avalon A1446 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Avalon A1446 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 39.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (24.5 vs 64.3 J/TH).