Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1346 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 37.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,380 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1346
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $79,106 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1346, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 197% more hashrate (110.0 vs 37.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1346 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1346 197% more hashrate (110.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 28% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,380 W)
- Avalon A1346 53% better efficiency (30.0 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Avalon A1346 100% better weight (12.3 vs 7,600.0 kg)
- Avalon A1346 39% more heat output (11,260 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1346 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1346 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.79 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$4,184 | Net after 1 year | -$1,578 |
| -$5,567 | Net after 2 years | -$3,156 |
| -$6,951 | Net after 3 years | -$4,734 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1346Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A134630.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1346 is more profitable at $-3.79/day compared to $-4.32/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Avalon A1346 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1346 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1346 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 34.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (30.0 vs 64.3 J/TH).