Avalon A1246 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1246 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 37.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Power Consumption | 2,380 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1246
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $79,106 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1246, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 143% more hashrate (90.0 vs 37.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1246 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1246 143% more hashrate (90.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 30% better power draw (3,420 vs 2,380 W)
- Avalon A1246 41% better efficiency (38.0 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Avalon A1246 100% better weight (12.3 vs 7,600.0 kg)
- Avalon A1246 44% more heat output (11,669 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1246 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1246 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.83 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$3,563 | Net after 1 year | -$1,578 |
| -$5,325 | Net after 2 years | -$3,156 |
| -$7,088 | Net after 3 years | -$4,734 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1246Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A124638.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1246 or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 is more profitable at $-4.32/day compared to $-4.83/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1246 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1246 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1246 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1246 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1246 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 26.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficiency (38.0 vs 64.3 J/TH).