Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs Ebang Ebit E9.2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3S | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9.2 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 1,320 W |
| 23.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 110.0 J/TH |
| 30 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.9 kg | Weight | 4,700.0 kg |
| 478 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,504 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Ebang Ebit E9.2
Based on BTC price of $79,127 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 89% better power draw (140 vs 1,320 W) in the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S's favour. The Ebang Ebit E9.2 claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S and Ebang Ebit E9.2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Ebang Ebit E9.2 100% more hashrate (6.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 89% better power draw (140 vs 1,320 W)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 79% better efficiency (23.3 vs 110.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 100% better weight (0.9 vs 4,700.0 kg)
- Ebang Ebit E9.2 843% more heat output (478 vs 4,504 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3S | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9.2 |
|---|---|---|
| $145 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.12 | Daily net profit | -$2.73 |
| -$188 | Net after 1 year | -$997 |
| -$231 | Net after 2 years | -$1,994 |
| -$274 | Net after 3 years | -$2,990 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3SScore: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S23.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S or the Ebang Ebit E9.2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-2.73/day for the Ebang Ebit E9.2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs Ebang Ebit E9.2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9.2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S or the Ebang Ebit E9.2?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9.2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S and Ebang Ebit E9.2 on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9.2 runs at 110.0 J/TH — a difference of 86.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (23.3 vs 110.0 J/TH).