Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Hashrate 62.0 TH/s Power 3,286 W Efficiency 53.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M50S+

Whatsminer M50S+

Hashrate 138.0 TH/s Power 3,276 W Efficiency 23.7 J/TH

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) vs Whatsminer M50S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) Specification Whatsminer M50S+
62.0 TH/s Hashrate 138.0 TH/s
3,286 W Power Consumption 3,276 W
53.0 J/TH Efficiency 23.7 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
14.0 kg Weight 13.0 kg
11,212 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,178 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bolon Miner Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00002853 BTC $2.26
Daily Electricity -$7.89
Daily Profit -$5.63
Monthly -$168.85
Yearly -$2,054.35

Whatsminer M50S+

Daily Revenue 0.00006351 BTC $5.03
Daily Electricity -$7.86
Daily Profit -$2.84
Monthly -$85.09
Yearly -$1,035.29

Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M50S+ wins on 5 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 55% better efficiency (53.0 vs 23.7 J/TH) in the Whatsminer M50S+'s favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Whatsminer M50S+ — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) and Whatsminer M50S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Whatsminer M50S+ 123% more hashrate (62.0 vs 138.0 TH/s)
  • Whatsminer M50S+ 55% better efficiency (53.0 vs 23.7 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M50S+ 7% better weight (14.0 vs 13.0 kg)
  • Whatsminer M50S+ 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) Metric Whatsminer M50S+
Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,500
-$5.63 Daily net profit -$2.84
-$2,054 Net after 1 year -$4,535
-$4,109 Net after 2 years -$5,571
-$6,163 Net after 3 years -$6,606
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M50S+

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M50S+

23.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) or Whatsminer M50S+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S+ is more profitable at $-2.84/day compared to $-5.63/day for the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) vs Whatsminer M50S+: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Whatsminer M50S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) or Whatsminer M50S+?

The Whatsminer M50S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) and Whatsminer M50S+ on J/TH?

The Bolon Miner B11 (62Th) runs at 53.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S+ runs at 23.7 J/TH — a difference of 29.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficiency (53.0 vs 23.7 J/TH).