GMO miner B2 vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| GMO miner B2 | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 24.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 1,950 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| 81.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 42 dB |
| — | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 6,653 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| GMO miner | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
GMO miner B2
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe GT comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 96% better power draw (1,950.0 vs 75.0 W). The GMO miner B2 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the GMO miner B2 and Bitaxe GT actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- GMO miner B2 380% more hashrate (24.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 96% better power draw (1,950.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 82% better efficiency (81.3 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- GMO miner B2 2500% more heat output (6,653 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 129% more home mining score (28.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| GMO miner B2 | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$3.81 | Daily net profit | $0.00 |
| -$1,389 | Net after 1 year | -$498 |
| -$2,778 | Net after 2 years | -$497 |
| -$4,167 | Net after 3 years | -$497 |
| — | Payback period | Takes ~650.6 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitaxe GT$3.81/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the GMO miner B2 or the Bitaxe GT?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.81/day for the GMO miner B2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the GMO miner B2 or Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the GMO miner B2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the GMO miner B2 or the Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between GMO miner B2 and Bitaxe GT?
The GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 66.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (81.3 vs 15.0 J/TH).