Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | GMO miner B2 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 24.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 1,950 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 81.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,653 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | GMO miner |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
GMO miner B2
Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the GMO miner B2 wins on 2 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 71% more hashrate (14.0 vs 24.0 TH/s) in the GMO miner B2's favour. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and GMO miner B2 sit on each measurable spec:
- GMO miner B2 71% more hashrate (14.0 vs 24.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 31% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,950 W)
- GMO miner B2 16% better efficiency (96.4 vs 81.3 J/TH)
- GMO miner B2 44% more heat output (4,606 vs 6,653 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 111% more home mining score (59.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | GMO miner B2 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$3.82 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,393 |
| -$2,347 | Net after 2 years | -$2,787 |
| -$3,346 | Net after 3 years | -$4,180 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
GMO miner B281.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the GMO miner B2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-3.82/day for the GMO miner B2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or GMO miner B2?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the GMO miner B2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or GMO miner B2?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and GMO miner B2?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH — a difference of 15.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficiency (96.4 vs 81.3 J/TH).