Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S17 Pro

Antminer S17 Pro

Hashrate 56.0 TH/s Power 2,212 W Efficiency 39.5 J/TH
VS
GMO miner B2

GMO miner B2

Hashrate 24.0 TH/s Power 1,950 W Efficiency 81.3 J/TH

Antminer S17 Pro vs GMO miner B2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S17 Pro Specification GMO miner B2
56.0 TH/s Hashrate 24.0 TH/s
2,212 W Power Consumption 1,950 W
39.5 J/TH Efficiency 81.3 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
9.5 kg Weight
7,547 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,653 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer GMO miner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S17 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00002577 BTC $2.01
Daily Electricity -$5.31
Daily Profit -$3.29
Monthly -$98.84
Yearly -$1,202.59

GMO miner B2

Daily Revenue 0.00001104 BTC $0.86
Daily Electricity -$4.68
Daily Profit -$3.82
Monthly -$114.51
Yearly -$1,393.15

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S17 Pro wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 133% more hashrate (56.0 vs 24.0 TH/s). That said, the GMO miner B2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer S17 Pro — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer S17 Pro and GMO miner B2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer S17 Pro 133% more hashrate (56.0 vs 24.0 TH/s)
  • GMO miner B2 12% better power draw (2,212 vs 1,950 W)
  • Antminer S17 Pro 51% better efficiency (39.5 vs 81.3 J/TH)
  • Antminer S17 Pro 13% more heat output (7,547 vs 6,653 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S17 Pro 200% more home mining score (84.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S17 Pro

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S17 Pro

39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer S17 Pro or the GMO miner B2?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 Pro is more profitable at $-3.29/day compared to $-3.82/day for the GMO miner B2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer S17 Pro or GMO miner B2?

The Antminer S17 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the GMO miner B2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S17 Pro or the GMO miner B2?

The Antminer S17 Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer S17 Pro vs GMO miner B2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer S17 Pro runs at 39.5 J/TH while the GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH — a difference of 41.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficiency (39.5 vs 81.3 J/TH).