Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitaxe Gamma

Bitaxe Gamma

Hashrate 1,200.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E12+

Ebang Ebit E12+

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 2,500 W Efficiency 50.0 J/TH

Bitaxe Gamma vs Ebang Ebit E12+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Gamma Specification Ebang Ebit E12+
1,200.0 GH/s Hashrate 50.0 TH/s
15 W Power Consumption 2,500 W
12.5 J/TH Efficiency 50.0 J/TH
38 dB Noise Level
0.3 kg Weight 10,500.0 kg
51 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,530 BTU/hr
70/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Gamma

Daily Revenue 0.00000057 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit $0.01
Monthly $0.27
Yearly $3.30

Ebang Ebit E12+

Daily Revenue 0.00002373 BTC $1.88
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$4.12
Monthly -$123.69
Yearly -$1,504.90

Based on BTC price of $79,106 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Gamma edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,500.0 W) in the Bitaxe Gamma's favour. The Ebang Ebit E12+ holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitaxe Gamma — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitaxe Gamma and Ebang Ebit E12+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 4067% more hashrate (1.2 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,500.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 75% better efficiency (12.5 vs 50.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 100% better weight (0.3 vs 10,500.0 kg)
  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 16560% more heat output (51.2 vs 8,530.0 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 169% more home mining score (70.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitaxe Gamma Metric Ebang Ebit E12+
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP)
$0.01 Daily net profit -$4.12
-$96 Net after 1 year -$1,505
-$92 Net after 2 years -$3,010
-$89 Net after 3 years -$4,515
Takes ~30.0 years to pay back at current rates Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe Gamma

$4.13/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Gamma

Score: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Gamma

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitaxe Gamma vs Ebang Ebit E12+: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Ebang Ebit E12+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitaxe Gamma or Ebang Ebit E12+?

The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E12+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe Gamma or the Ebang Ebit E12+?

The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Ebang Ebit E12+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitaxe Gamma and Ebang Ebit E12+?

The Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E12+ runs at 50.0 J/TH — a difference of 37.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (12.5 vs 50.0 J/TH).