Bitaxe GT vs NerdQAxe++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe GT | Specification | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.0 TH/s |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 42 dB | Noise Level | 42 dB |
| 0.4 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 256 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 409 BTU/hr |
| 64/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe GT
NerdQAxe++
Based on BTC price of $74,872 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Bitaxe's highest-hashrate single chip versus the NerdQAxe++'s quad-chip approach. Two philosophies for serious open-source solo mining.
The NerdQAxe++ produces more total hashrate from its four chips, but the Bitaxe GT achieves impressive performance from a single chip. The GT is simpler to set up and power, while the QAxe++ maximizes hashrate per device.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses less power?
The single-chip Bitaxe GT draws less total power. Both require 12V DC, but the GT's XT30 connector and lower wattage make it easier to power.
Which is easier to set up?
The Bitaxe GT — single chip, single firmware, simple AxeOS web interface. The NerdQAxe++ is straightforward too but has more components.