Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitaxe GT

Bitaxe GT

Hashrate 5.0 TH/s Power 75 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M30S

Whatsminer M30S

Hashrate 88.0 TH/s Power 3,344 W Efficiency 38.0 J/TH

Bitaxe GT vs Whatsminer M30S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe GT Specification Whatsminer M30S
5.0 TH/s Hashrate 88.0 TH/s
75 W Power Consumption 3,344 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 38.0 J/TH
42 dB Noise Level 75 dB
0.4 kg Weight 11.5 kg
256 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,410 BTU/hr
64/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe GT

Daily Revenue 0.00000230 BTC $0.18
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit $0.00
Monthly $0.06
Yearly $0.69

Whatsminer M30S

Daily Revenue 0.00004050 BTC $3.20
Daily Electricity -$8.03
Daily Profit -$4.82
Monthly -$144.73
Yearly -$1,760.88

Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe GT edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 98% better power draw (75.0 vs 3,344.0 W). The Whatsminer M30S holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Bitaxe GT — wins on 4 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitaxe GT and Whatsminer M30S actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Whatsminer M30S 1660% more hashrate (5.0 vs 88.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe GT 98% better power draw (75.0 vs 3,344.0 W)
  • Bitaxe GT 61% better efficiency (15.0 vs 38.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe GT 44% better noise (42.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Bitaxe GT 97% better weight (0.4 vs 11.5 kg)
  • Whatsminer M30S 4359% more heat output (256 vs 11,410 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe GT 78% more home mining score (64.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitaxe GT Metric Whatsminer M30S
$499 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,500
$0.00 Daily net profit -$4.82
-$498 Net after 1 year -$3,261
-$498 Net after 2 years -$5,022
-$497 Net after 3 years -$6,783
Takes ~723.5 years to pay back at current rates Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe GT

$4.83/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe GT

Score: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe GT

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitaxe GT vs Whatsminer M30S: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-4.82/day for the Whatsminer M30S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitaxe GT or the Whatsminer M30S better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Whatsminer M30S at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe GT or the Whatsminer M30S?

The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M30S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitaxe GT vs Whatsminer M30S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 23.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficiency (15.0 vs 38.0 J/TH).