Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Innosilicon T3 39T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition | Specification | Innosilicon T3 39T |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 39.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 2,150 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.1 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 8,650.0 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,336 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition
Innosilicon T3 39T
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 27% better efficiency (40.0 vs 55.1 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition and Innosilicon T3 39T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 28% more hashrate (50.0 vs 39.0 TH/s)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 7% better power draw (2,000 vs 2,150 W)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 27% better efficiency (40.0 vs 55.1 J/TH)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 100% better weight (14.0 vs 8,650.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T3 39T 8% more heat output (6,824 vs 7,336 BTU/hr)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 115% more home mining score (56.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition | Metric | Innosilicon T3 39T |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$3.74 |
| -$1,887 | Net after 1 year | -$1,366 |
| -$2,975 | Net after 2 years | -$2,731 |
| -$4,063 | Net after 3 years | -$4,097 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitcoin Space Heater S17 EditionScore: 56/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Innosilicon T3 39T: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition is more profitable at $-2.98/day compared to $-3.74/day for the Innosilicon T3 39T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition or Innosilicon T3 39T?
The Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 39T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition or Innosilicon T3 39T?
The Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 39T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Innosilicon T3 39T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 39T runs at 55.1 J/TH — a difference of 15.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficiency (40.0 vs 55.1 J/TH).
Compare Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition with...
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S19 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Compare Innosilicon T3 39T with...
- Innosilicon T3 39T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3 39T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3 39T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T3 39T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T3 39T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3 39T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
