Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 2,000 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 39T

Innosilicon T3 39T

Hashrate 39.0 TH/s Power 2,150 W Efficiency 55.1 J/TH

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Innosilicon T3 39T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition Specification Innosilicon T3 39T
50.0 TH/s Hashrate 39.0 TH/s
2,000 W Power Consumption 2,150 W
40.0 J/TH Efficiency 55.1 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level
14.0 kg Weight 8,650.0 kg
6,824 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,336 BTU/hr
56/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.82
Daily Electricity -$4.80
Daily Profit -$2.98
Monthly -$89.43
Yearly -$1,088.10

Innosilicon T3 39T

Daily Revenue 0.00001795 BTC $1.42
Daily Electricity -$5.16
Daily Profit -$3.74
Monthly -$112.24
Yearly -$1,365.56

Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 27% better efficiency (40.0 vs 55.1 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition and Innosilicon T3 39T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 28% more hashrate (50.0 vs 39.0 TH/s)
  • Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 7% better power draw (2,000 vs 2,150 W)
  • Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 27% better efficiency (40.0 vs 55.1 J/TH)
  • Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 100% better weight (14.0 vs 8,650.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 8% more heat output (6,824 vs 7,336 BTU/hr)
  • Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 115% more home mining score (56.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition Metric Innosilicon T3 39T
$799 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.98 Daily net profit -$3.74
-$1,887 Net after 1 year -$1,366
-$2,975 Net after 2 years -$2,731
-$4,063 Net after 3 years -$4,097
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition

Score: 56/100. 55 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition

40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Innosilicon T3 39T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition is more profitable at $-2.98/day compared to $-3.74/day for the Innosilicon T3 39T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition or Innosilicon T3 39T?

The Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 39T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition or Innosilicon T3 39T?

The Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 39T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Innosilicon T3 39T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 39T runs at 55.1 J/TH — a difference of 15.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficiency (40.0 vs 55.1 J/TH).