Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Hashrate 500.0 MH/s Power 960 W Efficiency 1,920,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 39T

Innosilicon T3 39T

Hashrate 39.0 TH/s Power 2,150 W Efficiency 55.1 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon T3 39T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Specification Innosilicon T3 39T
500.0 MH/s Hashrate 39.0 TH/s
960 W Power Consumption 2,150 W
1,920,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 55.1 J/TH
Noise Level
8,100.0 kg Weight 8,650.0 kg
3,276 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,336 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.30
Daily Profit -$2.30
Monthly -$69.12
Yearly -$840.95

Innosilicon T3 39T

Daily Revenue 0.00001795 BTC $1.42
Daily Electricity -$5.16
Daily Profit -$3.74
Monthly -$112.22
Yearly -$1,365.36

Based on BTC price of $79,081 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Innosilicon T3 39T edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 7799900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 39.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon T3 39T's favour. The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Innosilicon T3 39T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Innosilicon T3 39T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T3 39T 7799900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 39.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 55% better power draw (960 vs 2,150 W)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 100% better efficiency (1,920,000.0 vs 55.1 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 6% better weight (8,100 vs 8,650 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 124% more heat output (3,276 vs 7,336 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Metric Innosilicon T3 39T
$469 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.30 Daily net profit -$3.74
-$1,310 Net after 1 year -$1,365
-$2,151 Net after 2 years -$2,731
-$2,992 Net after 3 years -$4,096
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3 39T

55.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or the Innosilicon T3 39T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) is more profitable at $-2.30/day compared to $-3.74/day for the Innosilicon T3 39T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon T3 39T: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon T3 39T: which fits a residential setup better?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 39T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Innosilicon T3 39T on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 39T runs at 55.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,919,944.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,920,000.0 vs 55.1 J/TH).