Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Hashrate 280.0 MH/s Power 1,050 W Efficiency 3,750,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 39T

Innosilicon T3 39T

Hashrate 39.0 TH/s Power 2,150 W Efficiency 55.1 J/TH

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon T3 39T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A4 Dominator Specification Innosilicon T3 39T
280.0 MH/s Hashrate 39.0 TH/s
1,050 W Power Consumption 2,150 W
3,750,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 55.1 J/TH
Noise Level
9,200.0 kg Weight 8,650.0 kg
3,583 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,336 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.52
Daily Profit -$2.52
Monthly -$75.60
Yearly -$919.80

Innosilicon T3 39T

Daily Revenue 0.00001795 BTC $1.42
Daily Electricity -$5.16
Daily Profit -$3.74
Monthly -$112.25
Yearly -$1,365.68

Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon T3 39T, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 13928471% more hashrate (0.0 vs 39.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon A4 Dominator isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T3 39T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A4 Dominator and Innosilicon T3 39T sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon T3 39T 13928471% more hashrate (0.0 vs 39.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 51% better power draw (1,050 vs 2,150 W)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 100% better efficiency (3,750,000.0 vs 55.1 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 6% better weight (9,200 vs 8,650 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 105% more heat output (3,583 vs 7,336 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3 39T

55.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon T3 39T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A4 Dominator is more profitable at $-2.52/day compared to $-3.74/day for the Innosilicon T3 39T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A4 Dominator or Innosilicon T3 39T?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A4 Dominator or the Innosilicon T3 39T?

The Innosilicon A4 Dominator scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 39T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A4 Dominator and Innosilicon T3 39T on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A4 Dominator runs at 3,750,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 39T runs at 55.1 J/TH — a difference of 3,749,944.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (3,750,000.0 vs 55.1 J/TH).