Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Baikal BK-D

Baikal BK-D

Hashrate 320.0 GH/s Power 1,100 W Efficiency 3,437.5 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DSM7T

iBeLink DSM7T

Hashrate 7.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 300.0 J/TH

Baikal BK-D vs iBeLink DSM7T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-D Specification iBeLink DSM7T
320.0 GH/s Hashrate 7.0 TH/s
1,100 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
3,437.5 J/TH Efficiency 300.0 J/TH
Noise Level
6,500.0 kg Weight 15,600.0 kg
3,753 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm Blake256r14
Baikal Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-D

Daily Revenue 0.00000015 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$2.64
Daily Profit -$2.63
Monthly -$78.85
Yearly -$959.40

iBeLink DSM7T

Daily Revenue 0.00000322 BTC $0.25
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$4.79
Monthly -$143.65
Yearly -$1,747.71

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink DSM7T edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 2088% more hashrate (0.3 vs 7.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink DSM7T's favour. That said, the Baikal BK-D isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iBeLink DSM7T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Baikal BK-D and iBeLink DSM7T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iBeLink DSM7T 2088% more hashrate (0.3 vs 7.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-D 48% better power draw (1,100 vs 2,100 W)
  • iBeLink DSM7T 91% better efficiency (3,438 vs 300 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-D 58% better weight (6,500 vs 15,600 kg)
  • iBeLink DSM7T 91% more heat output (3,753 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal BK-D 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal BK-D

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink DSM7T

300.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Baikal BK-D vs iBeLink DSM7T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-D is more profitable at $-2.63/day compared to $-4.79/day for the iBeLink DSM7T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-D or iBeLink DSM7T?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-D or iBeLink DSM7T?

The Baikal BK-D scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink DSM7T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-D and iBeLink DSM7T?

The Baikal BK-D runs at 3,437.5 J/TH while the iBeLink DSM7T runs at 300.0 J/TH — a difference of 3,137.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficiency (3,438 vs 300 J/TH).