Baikal BK-X vs Dayun Zig D1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-X | Specification | Dayun Zig D1 |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 48.0 GH/s |
| 630 W | Power Consumption | 2,200 W |
| 63,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45,833.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 3,700.0 kg | Weight | 9,850.0 kg |
| 2,150 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Dayun |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-X
Dayun Zig D1
Based on BTC price of $74,353 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the Dayun Zig D1 offers 27% better efficiency at 45,833.3 J/TH compared to the Baikal BK-X at 63,000.0 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-XScore: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dayun Zig D145,833.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-X or Dayun Zig D1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-X is more profitable at $-1.51/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Dayun Zig D1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-X or Dayun Zig D1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-X or Dayun Zig D1?
The Baikal BK-X scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Dayun Zig D1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-X and Dayun Zig D1?
The Baikal BK-X runs at 63,000.0 J/TH while the Dayun Zig D1 runs at 45,833.3 J/TH — a difference of 17,166.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.