Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer D7

Antminer D7

Hashrate 1,286.0 GH/s Power 3,148 W Efficiency 2,447.9 J/TH
VS
Dayun Zig D1

Dayun Zig D1

Hashrate 48.0 GH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 45,833.3 J/TH

Antminer D7 vs Dayun Zig D1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D7 Specification Dayun Zig D1
1,286.0 GH/s Hashrate 48.0 GH/s
3,148 W Power Consumption 2,200 W
2,447.9 J/TH Efficiency 45,833.3 J/TH
70 dB Noise Level
14.4 kg Weight 9,850.0 kg
10,741 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,506 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm X11
Bitmain Manufacturer Dayun

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D7

Daily Revenue 0.00000059 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$7.51
Monthly -$225.27
Yearly -$2,740.81

Dayun Zig D1

Daily Revenue 0.00000002 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$5.28
Monthly -$158.35
Yearly -$1,926.57

Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer D7, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 2579% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Antminer D7's favour. The Dayun Zig D1 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer D7 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer D7 and Dayun Zig D1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer D7 2579% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Dayun Zig D1 30% better power draw (3,148 vs 2,200 W)
  • Antminer D7 95% better efficiency (2,448 vs 45,833 J/TH)
  • Antminer D7 100% better weight (14.4 vs 9,850.0 kg)
  • Antminer D7 43% more heat output (10,741 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer D7 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer D7 Metric Dayun Zig D1
$2,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.51 Daily net profit -$5.28
-$5,241 Net after 1 year -$1,927
-$7,982 Net after 2 years -$3,853
-$10,722 Net after 3 years -$5,780
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer D7

Score: 36/100. 70 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer D7

2,447.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer D7 or the Dayun Zig D1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Dayun Zig D1 is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer D7 or Dayun Zig D1?

The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Dayun Zig D1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer D7 vs Dayun Zig D1: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer D7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Dayun Zig D1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D7 and Dayun Zig D1?

The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Dayun Zig D1 runs at 45,833.3 J/TH — a difference of 43,385.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficiency (2,448 vs 45,833 J/TH).