iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink BM-K3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Specification | iBeLink BM-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 70.0 TH/s |
| 835 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 157.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 47.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 2,849 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1
iBeLink BM-K3
Based on BTC price of $74,178 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the iBeLink BM-K3 offers 70% better efficiency at 47.1 J/TH compared to the iBeLink BM-K1 at 157.6 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-K1Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K347.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K1 or iBeLink BM-K3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K1 is more profitable at $-1.83/day compared to $-5.67/day for the iBeLink BM-K3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-K1 or iBeLink BM-K3?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K1 or iBeLink BM-K3?
The iBeLink BM-K1 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink BM-K3?
The iBeLink BM-K1 runs at 157.6 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-K3 runs at 47.1 J/TH — a difference of 110.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.