iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink BM-N1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Specification | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.6 TH/s |
| 835 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 157.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 363.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 9,900.0 kg |
| 2,849 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1
iBeLink BM-N1
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink BM-K1 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 65% better power draw (835 vs 2,400 W). That said, the iBeLink BM-N1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink BM-N1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N1 25% more hashrate (5.3 vs 6.6 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-K1 65% better power draw (835 vs 2,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-K1 57% better efficiency (158 vs 364 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-K1 33% better weight (6,600 vs 9,900 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N1 187% more heat output (2,849 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-K1 8% more home mining score (28.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Metric | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| $9,855 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.81 | Daily net profit | -$5.52 |
| -$10,517 | Net after 1 year | -$2,016 |
| -$11,179 | Net after 2 years | -$4,032 |
| -$11,841 | Net after 3 years | -$6,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-K1Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K1157.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink BM-N1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K1 is more profitable at $-1.81/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink BM-N1: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink BM-N1: which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink BM-K1 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink BM-N1 on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-K1 runs at 157.6 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH — a difference of 206.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficiency (158 vs 364 J/TH).