iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink BM-K3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Specification | iBeLink BM-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 70.0 TH/s |
| 835 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 157.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 47.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 2,849 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1
iBeLink BM-K3
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink BM-K3 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1221% more hashrate (5.3 vs 70.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-K3's favour. The iBeLink BM-K1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink BM-K3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-K3 1221% more hashrate (5.3 vs 70.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-K1 75% better power draw (835 vs 3,300 W)
- iBeLink BM-K3 70% better efficiency (157.6 vs 47.1 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-K3 295% more heat output (2,849 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-K1 27% more home mining score (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Metric | iBeLink BM-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| $9,855 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $820 |
| -$1.81 | Daily net profit | -$5.40 |
| -$10,517 | Net after 1 year | -$2,792 |
| -$11,179 | Net after 2 years | -$4,764 |
| -$11,841 | Net after 3 years | -$6,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-K1Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K347.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K1 or iBeLink BM-K3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K1 is more profitable at $-1.81/day compared to $-5.40/day for the iBeLink BM-K3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink BM-K3: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink BM-K3: which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink BM-K1 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink BM-K3?
The iBeLink BM-K1 runs at 157.6 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-K3 runs at 47.1 J/TH — a difference of 110.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficiency (157.6 vs 47.1 J/TH).