iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink BM-KS Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Specification | iBeLink BM-KS Max |
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 11.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 47.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 309.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 12.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K3
iBeLink BM-KS Max
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-K3 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 85% better efficiency (47.1 vs 309.1 J/TH). The iBeLink BM-KS Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink BM-KS Max sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-K3 536% more hashrate (70.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-K3 3% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-K3 85% better efficiency (47.1 vs 309.1 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 3% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Metric | iBeLink BM-KS Max |
|---|---|---|
| $820 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,799 |
| -$5.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.76 |
| -$2,792 | Net after 1 year | -$4,633 |
| -$4,764 | Net after 2 years | -$7,467 |
| -$6,736 | Net after 3 years | -$10,301 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-KS MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K347.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink BM-KS Max: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K3 is more profitable at $-5.40/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-KS Max?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-K3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-KS Max?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink BM-KS Max?
The iBeLink BM-K3 runs at 47.1 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH — a difference of 262.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (47.1 vs 309.1 J/TH).