iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink BM-N1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.6 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 363.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 9,900.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
iBeLink BM-N1
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-KS Max, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 67% more hashrate (11.0 vs 6.6 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-N1 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink BM-N1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 67% more hashrate (11.0 vs 6.6 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-N1 29% better power draw (3,400 vs 2,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 15% better efficiency (309 vs 364 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 100% better weight (12.2 vs 9,900.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 42% more heat output (11,601 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$5.52 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$2,016 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$4,032 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$6,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-KS MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink BM-N1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-N1 is more profitable at $-5.52/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink BM-N1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink BM-N1?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink BM-N1?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH — a difference of 54.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (309 vs 364 J/TH).