iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink BM-KS Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Specification | iBeLink BM-KS Max |
|---|---|---|
| 32.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 11.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 309.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 12,200.0 kg | Weight | 12.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
iBeLink BM-KS Max
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 68% better efficiency (100 vs 309 J/TH). The iBeLink BM-KS Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink BM-KS Max actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 191% more hashrate (32.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 68% better efficiency (100 vs 309 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 100% better weight (12,200.0 vs 12.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 6% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Metric | iBeLink BM-KS Max |
|---|---|---|
| $1,250 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,799 |
| -$6.53 | Daily net profit | -$7.76 |
| -$3,633 | Net after 1 year | -$4,633 |
| -$6,016 | Net after 2 years | -$7,467 |
| -$8,399 | Net after 3 years | -$10,301 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-KS MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K1 Max100.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or the iBeLink BM-KS Max?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max is more profitable at $-6.53/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink BM-KS Max: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-K1 Max at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or the iBeLink BM-KS Max?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink BM-KS Max: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-K1 Max runs at 100.0 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH — a difference of 209.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficiency (100 vs 309 J/TH).