Ebang Ebit E10 vs FluMiner T3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Ebang Ebit E10 | Specification | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 115.0 TH/s |
| 1,650 W | Power Consumption | 1,700 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 9,800.0 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 5,630 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,800 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Ebang | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Ebang Ebit E10
FluMiner T3
Based on BTC price of $79,126 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the FluMiner T3, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 539% more hashrate (18.0 vs 115.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E10 holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Ebang Ebit E10 and FluMiner T3 sit on each measurable spec:
- FluMiner T3 539% more hashrate (18.0 vs 115.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E10 3% better power draw (1,650 vs 1,700 W)
- FluMiner T3 84% better efficiency (91.7 vs 14.8 J/TH)
- FluMiner T3 100% better weight (9,800.0 vs 12.6 kg)
- FluMiner T3 3% more heat output (5,630 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
- FluMiner T3 100% more home mining score (28.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Ebang Ebit E10 | Metric | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,601 |
| -$3.30 | Daily net profit | $0.11 |
| -$1,206 | Net after 1 year | -$1,562 |
| -$2,412 | Net after 2 years | -$1,522 |
| -$3,619 | Net after 3 years | -$1,483 |
| — | Payback period | Takes ~40.8 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
FluMiner T3$3.41/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
FluMiner T3Score: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner T314.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ebang Ebit E10 vs FluMiner T3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner T3 is more profitable at $0.11/day compared to $-3.30/day for the Ebang Ebit E10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Ebang Ebit E10 or the FluMiner T3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The FluMiner T3 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Ebang Ebit E10 vs FluMiner T3: which fits a residential setup better?
The FluMiner T3 scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Ebang Ebit E10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Ebang Ebit E10 vs FluMiner T3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Ebang Ebit E10 runs at 91.7 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 76.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (91.7 vs 14.8 J/TH).