Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Ebang Ebit E11++

Ebang Ebit E11++

Hashrate 44.0 TH/s Power 1,980 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 50T

Innosilicon T3 50T

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH

Ebang Ebit E11++ vs Innosilicon T3 50T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Ebang Ebit E11++ Specification Innosilicon T3 50T
44.0 TH/s Hashrate 50.0 TH/s
1,980 W Power Consumption 3,100 W
45.0 J/TH Efficiency 62.0 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 10,000.0 kg
6,756 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,577 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Ebang Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Ebang Ebit E11++

Daily Revenue 0.00002025 BTC $1.60
Daily Electricity -$4.75
Daily Profit -$3.15
Monthly -$94.52
Yearly -$1,150.02

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.82
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$5.62
Monthly -$168.61
Yearly -$2,051.44

Based on BTC price of $79,082 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Ebang Ebit E11++ edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 36% better power draw (1,980 vs 3,100 W). That said, the Innosilicon T3 50T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Ebang Ebit E11++ — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Ebang Ebit E11++ and Innosilicon T3 50T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T3 50T 14% more hashrate (44.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Ebang Ebit E11++ 36% better power draw (1,980 vs 3,100 W)
  • Ebang Ebit E11++ 27% better efficiency (45.0 vs 62.0 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T3 50T 57% more heat output (6,756 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
  • Ebang Ebit E11++ 27% more home mining score (28.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Ebang Ebit E11++

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Ebang Ebit E11++

45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Ebang Ebit E11++ or Innosilicon T3 50T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E11++ is more profitable at $-3.15/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Ebang Ebit E11++ or the Innosilicon T3 50T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Ebang Ebit E11++ or the Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Ebang Ebit E11++ scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3 50T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Ebang Ebit E11++ and Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Ebang Ebit E11++ runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 17.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficiency (45.0 vs 62.0 J/TH).