Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Ebang Ebit E12+

Ebang Ebit E12+

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 2,500 W Efficiency 50.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T

Hashrate 30.0 TH/s Power 2,400 W Efficiency 80.0 J/TH

Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Ebang Ebit E12+ Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
50.0 TH/s Hashrate 30.0 TH/s
2,500 W Power Consumption 2,400 W
50.0 J/TH Efficiency 80.0 J/TH
Noise Level
10,500.0 kg Weight 9,000.0 kg
8,530 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,189 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Ebang Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Ebang Ebit E12+

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$4.20
Monthly -$126.02
Yearly -$1,533.25

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T

Daily Revenue 0.00001381 BTC $1.08
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$4.68
Monthly -$140.41
Yearly -$1,708.35

Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Ebang Ebit E12+, which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 67% more hashrate (50.0 vs 30.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Ebang Ebit E12+ — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

The Ebang Ebit E12+ and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 67% more hashrate (50.0 vs 30.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T 4% better power draw (2,500 vs 2,400 W)
  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 38% better efficiency (50.0 vs 80.0 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T 14% better weight (10,500 vs 9,000 kg)
  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 4% more heat output (8,530 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Ebang Ebit E12+ Metric Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Upfront cost (MSRP) $200
-$4.20 Daily net profit -$4.68
-$1,533 Net after 1 year -$1,908
-$3,066 Net after 2 years -$3,617
-$4,600 Net after 3 years -$5,325
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Ebang Ebit E12+

50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Ebang Ebit E12+ or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E12+ is more profitable at $-4.20/day compared to $-4.68/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Ebang Ebit E12+ or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Ebang Ebit E12+ and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T on J/TH?

The Ebang Ebit E12+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 30.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficiency (50.0 vs 80.0 J/TH).