IceRiver KS3L vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 10.5 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 110% more hashrate (5.0 vs 10.5 TH/s). The IceRiver KS3L claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS3L and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 110% more hashrate (5.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3L 11% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 46% better efficiency (640 vs 343 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 1% better weight (14.4 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 13% more heat output (10,918 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3L 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$10,238 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$12,975 | Net after 2 years | -$11,572 |
| -$15,713 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3LScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3L vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3L is more profitable at $-7.50/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3L or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3L or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The IceRiver KS3L scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3L and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 297.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficiency (640 vs 343 J/TH).