Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Jasminer X16-Q

Jasminer X16-Q

Hashrate 1,950.0 MH/s Power 620 W Efficiency 317,948.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280

Hashrate 280.0 MH/s Power 220 W Efficiency 785,714.3 J/TH

Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X16-Q Specification iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280
1,950.0 MH/s Hashrate 280.0 MH/s
620 W Power Consumption 220 W
317,948.7 J/TH Efficiency 785,714.3 J/TH
40 dB Noise Level 40 dB
10.0 kg Weight 2.1 kg
2,115 BTU/hr BTU Output 751 BTU/hr
65/100 Home Mining Score 66/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Jasminer Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X16-Q

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.49
Daily Profit -$1.49
Monthly -$44.64
Yearly -$543.10

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.53
Daily Profit -$0.53
Monthly -$15.84
Yearly -$192.72

Based on BTC price of $71,274 and current network difficulty as of Mar 25, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-Q wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Jasminer X16-Q — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280

Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X16-Q

317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?

The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Jasminer X16-Q). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280?

The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 runs at 785,714.3 J/TH — a difference of 467,765.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.