Iceriver KAS KS5M vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS5M | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 226.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $71,465 and current network difficulty as of Mar 25, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver KAS KS5M wins on 3 of 3 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver KAS KS5M or Iceriver KS3M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS5M is more profitable at $-7.70/day compared to $-7.97/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS5M or Iceriver KS3M?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS5M or Iceriver KS3M?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KAS KS5M and Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 340.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.