IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 15.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS5M edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 3749900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 15.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KAS KS5M's favour. The IceRiver AL0 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KAS KS5M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 3749900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 227 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 87% better noise (10.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$3,231 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$6,013 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$8,795 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KAS KS5M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS5M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KAS KS5M on J/TH?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 249,773.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 227 J/TH).