Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 MH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 10 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 3749900% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the IceRiver AL0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver AL0 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AL3 3749900% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 97% better power draw (3,500 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver AL3 100% better efficiency (233 vs 250,000 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 87% better noise (75.0 vs 10.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 84% better weight (16.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 3400% more heat output (11,942 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 97% more home mining score (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.24 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$287 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$374 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$462 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver AL0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver AL0: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver AL0?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver AL0?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,766.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (233 vs 250,000 J/TH).