Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver AL3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 15.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,500 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 233.3 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver AL3
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver AL3 wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 2083233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 15.0 TH/s). The Iceriver AE2 720Mh claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver AL3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AL3 2083233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 63% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,500 W)
- Iceriver AL3 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 233 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 3% better weight (15.5 vs 16.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 169% more heat output (4,436 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 44% more home mining score (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,550 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$7.86 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$4,419 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$7,288 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$10,157 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver AL3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver AL3?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver AL3?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver AL3 on J/TH?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,805,322.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 233 J/TH).