Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,580 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,790,000.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,215 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 178% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 64% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,580 W)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 1% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 1,790,000 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 3% better weight (15.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 175% more heat output (4,436 vs 12,215 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 73% more home mining score (52.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,390 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$8.59 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$8,526 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$11,662 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$14,798 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)1,790,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 15,555.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 1,790,000 J/TH).