Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver ALPH AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 3,580 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Iceriver ALPH AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver ALPH AL0 edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 250 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver ALPH AL0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 19900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 97% better power draw (3,580 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 83% better weight (15.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 3480% more heat output (12,215 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 113% more home mining score (30.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $178 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$260 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$343 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$425 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL0Score: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALPH AL0250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the Iceriver ALPH AL0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the Iceriver ALPH AL0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver ALPH AL0 runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,750.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 250 J/TH).