Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,580 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,790,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,215 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (233 vs 1,790,000 J/TH) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 749900% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AL3 2% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,580 W)
- Iceriver AL3 100% better efficiency (233 vs 1,790,000 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 6% better weight (16.0 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 2% more heat output (11,942 vs 12,215 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AL3 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,390 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$8.59 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$8,526 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$11,662 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$14,798 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AL3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AL3 is more profitable at $-7.86/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver AL3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,766.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (233 vs 1,790,000 J/TH).