Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver KS3M wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 833233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS3M 833233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 62% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS3M 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 9% better weight (15.5 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 162% more heat output (4,436 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 44% more home mining score (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver KS3M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver KS3M on J/TH?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,804,988.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 567 J/TH).