Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Hashrate 24.0 TH/s Power 1,980 W Efficiency 82.5 J/TH

Innosilicon T3 50T

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH

Innosilicon T2 Turbo vs Innosilicon T3 50T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon T2 Turbo	Specification	Innosilicon T3 50T
24.0 TH/s	Hashrate	50.0 TH/s
1,980 W	Power Consumption	3,100 W
82.5 J/TH	Efficiency	62.0 J/TH
—	Noise Level	—
7,500.0 kg	Weight	10,000.0 kg
6,756 BTU/hr	BTU Output	10,577 BTU/hr
28/100	Home Mining Score	22/100
—	Release Year	—
SHA-256	Algorithm	SHA-256
Innosilicon	Manufacturer	Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Daily Revenue 0.00001104 BTC $0.88

Daily Electricity -$4.75

Daily Profit -$3.88

Monthly -$116.29

Yearly -$1,414.92

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.82

Daily Electricity -$7.44

Daily Profit -$5.62

Monthly -$168.48

Yearly -$2,049.85

Based on BTC price of $79,271 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon T3 50T comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 108% more hashrate (24.0 vs 50.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon T3 50T's favour. That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Innosilicon T3 50T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo and Innosilicon T3 50T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

Innosilicon T3 50T 108% more hashrate (24.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 36% better power draw (1,980 vs 3,100 W)
Innosilicon T3 50T 25% better efficiency (82.5 vs 62.0 J/TH)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25% better weight (7,500 vs 10,000 kg)
Innosilicon T3 50T 57% more heat output (6,756 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 27% more home mining score (28.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3 50T

62.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo or the Innosilicon T3 50T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo is more profitable at $-3.88/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo or Innosilicon T3 50T?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon T2 Turbo vs Innosilicon T3 50T: which fits a residential setup better?

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3 50T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon T2 Turbo and Innosilicon T3 50T on J/TH?

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo runs at 82.5 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (82.5 vs 62.0 J/TH).

Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo with...

Compare Innosilicon T3 50T with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.