Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs FusionSilicon X7 Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Specification | FusionSilicon X7 Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 262.0 GH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 1,420 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 5,419.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 4,800.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,845 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | FusionSilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
FusionSilicon X7 Miner
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 576% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.3 TH/s). The FusionSilicon X7 Miner claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and FusionSilicon X7 Miner actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 576% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.3 TH/s)
- FusionSilicon X7 Miner 50% better power draw (2,839 vs 1,420 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 70% better efficacité (1,604 vs 5,420 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 4,800.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 100% more heat output (9,687 vs 4,845 BTU/hr)
- FusionSilicon X7 Miner 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Metric | FusionSilicon X7 Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $1,030 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$3.40 |
| -$3,494 | Net after 1 year | -$1,240 |
| -$5,957 | Net after 2 years | -$2,481 |
| -$8,421 | Net after 3 years | -$3,721 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
FusionSilicon X7 MinerScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)1,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or the FusionSilicon X7 Miner?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FusionSilicon X7 Miner is more profitable at $-3.40/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or the FusionSilicon X7 Miner better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or the FusionSilicon X7 Miner?
The FusionSilicon X7 Miner scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs FusionSilicon X7 Miner: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the FusionSilicon X7 Miner runs at 5,419.9 J/TH — a difference of 3,815.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficacité (1,604 vs 5,420 J/TH).