Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 GH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 550 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-QE comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 75% better power draw (2,200 vs 550 W). That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer E9 Pro and Jasminer X16-QE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer E9 Pro 110% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-QE 75% better power draw (2,200 vs 550 W)
- Jasminer X16-QE 47% better efficacité (597,826 vs 314,286 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-QE 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Jasminer X16-QE 30% better weight (14.2 vs 10.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 300% more heat output (7,506 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-QE 63% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $469 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$1,433 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$1,914 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QEScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Jasminer X16-QE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the Jasminer X16-QE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Jasminer X16-QE?
The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and Jasminer X16-QE?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 283,540.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (597,826 vs 314,286 J/TH).