Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Antminer K7 vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer K7 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 368.0 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Consommation électrique | 4,080 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 11.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 17.2 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,921 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer K7
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 480% more hashrate (63.5 vs 368.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)'s favour. The Antminer K7 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer K7 and Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 480% more hashrate (63.5 vs 368.0 TH/s)
- Antminer K7 25% better power draw (3,080 vs 4,080 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 77% better efficacité (48.5 vs 11.1 J/TH)
- Antminer K7 18% better weight (14.0 vs 17.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 32% more heat output (10,509 vs 13,921 BTU/hr)
- Antminer K7 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer K7 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,899 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | $3.46 |
| -$5,364 | Net after 1 year | -$4,638 |
| -$7,227 | Net after 2 years | -$3,377 |
| -$9,091 | Net after 3 years | -$2,115 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~4.7 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)$8.56/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer K7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)11.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer K7 or the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) is more profitable at $3.46/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer K7 or Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer K7 or the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)?
The Antminer K7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer K7 and Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) runs at 11.1 J/TH — a difference of 37.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (48.5 vs 11.1 J/TH).