Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 368.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 4,080 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 11.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 17.2 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,921 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 20691% more hashrate (1.8 vs 368.0 TH/s). The Antminer D9 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 20691% more hashrate (1.8 vs 368.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 30% better power draw (2,839 vs 4,080 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 99% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 11.1 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 6% better weight (16.1 vs 17.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 44% more heat output (9,687 vs 13,921 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,899 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | $3.46 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$4,638 |
| -$7,927 | Net after 2 years | -$3,377 |
| -$10,391 | Net after 3 years | -$2,115 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~4.7 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)$10.21/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)11.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) is more profitable at $3.46/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) runs at 11.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,592.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 11.1 J/TH).