Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 368.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 4,080 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 11.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 17.2 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,921 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Based on BTC price of $64,316 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 2200% more hashrate (16.0 vs 368.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)'s favour. The Antminer AL1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 2200% more hashrate (16.0 vs 368.0 TH/s)
- Antminer AL1 18% better power draw (3,360 vs 4,080 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 95% better efficacité (210.0 vs 11.1 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 15% better weight (14.5 vs 17.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 21% more heat output (11,464 vs 13,921 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,899 |
| -$7.60 | Daily net profit | $0.92 |
| -$12,773 | Net after 1 year | -$5,565 |
| -$15,547 | Net after 2 years | -$5,231 |
| -$18,320 | Net after 3 years | -$4,896 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~17.6 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)$8.51/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)11.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) is more profitable at $0.92/day compared to $-7.60/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) runs at 11.1 J/TH — a difference of 198.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (210.0 vs 11.1 J/TH).