Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 368.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 4,080 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 11.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 17.2 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,921 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
Based on BTC price of $64,316 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 3815% more hashrate (9.4 vs 368.0 TH/s). The Antminer KS3 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 3815% more hashrate (9.4 vs 368.0 TH/s)
- Antminer KS3 14% better power draw (3,500 vs 4,080 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 97% better efficacité (372.3 vs 11.1 J/TH)
- Antminer KS3 6% better weight (16.1 vs 17.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 17% more heat output (11,942 vs 13,921 BTU/hr)
- Antminer KS3 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,899 |
| -$8.13 | Daily net profit | $0.92 |
| -$10,966 | Net after 1 year | -$5,565 |
| -$13,932 | Net after 2 years | -$5,231 |
| -$16,899 | Net after 3 years | -$4,896 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~17.6 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)$9.04/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)11.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer KS3 or the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) is more profitable at $0.92/day compared to $-8.13/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer KS3 or Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) runs at 11.1 J/TH — a difference of 361.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficacité (372.3 vs 11.1 J/TH).