Antminer KS3 vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer KS3 edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 88% more hashrate (9.4 vs 5.0 TH/s) in the Antminer KS3's favour. The IceRiver KS3L holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS3 and IceRiver KS3L sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer KS3 88% more hashrate (9.4 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3L 9% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,200 W)
- Antminer KS3 42% better efficacité (372 vs 640 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 11% better weight (16.1 vs 14.4 kg)
- Antminer KS3 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,500 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$7.50 |
| -$10,943 | Net after 1 year | -$10,238 |
| -$13,885 | Net after 2 years | -$12,975 |
| -$16,828 | Net after 3 years | -$15,713 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS3372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer KS3 or the IceRiver KS3L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3L is more profitable at $-7.50/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer KS3 or IceRiver KS3L?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS3 or IceRiver KS3L?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer KS3 and IceRiver KS3L?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 267.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (372 vs 640 J/TH).